Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

Saturday, March 12


excerpt:
English is Crazy Language

English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in pineapple. English muffins weren't invented in England or French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candies while sweetbreads, which aren't sweet, are meat. 

We take English for granted. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig. And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, why isn't the plural of booth beeth? One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese? If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it? 

If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat? Sometimes I think all the English speakers should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane. In what language do people recite at a play and play at a recital? Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run and feet that smell? How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites? 

Have you noticed that we talk about certain things only when they are absent? Have you ever seen a horsefull carriage or a strapfull gown? Met a sung hero or experienced requited love? Have you ever run into someone who was combobulated, gruntled, ruly or peccable? And where are all those people who ARE spring chickens or who would actually hurt a fly? 

You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which an alarm goes off by going on.

Wednesday, September 15



"I was glad to be offered the apology—and about time, too—but I was far from ready to accept it. Not that it was a bad apology, but it never quite rose to the level I’d expected, and so I declined. Then, a day or two later, the apology was resubmitted and I was asked again if I would accept. Perhaps, I said, but not in that form.

As a matter of principle, I find it hard to accept an apology that is tendered too quickly. What is the apologist saying by acting with such haste, and what am I, by accepting the apology, saying about myself? It’s possible to demean oneself by sinking to the level of those who promiscuously accept any sort of apology. Also, in doing so, would I be veering dangerously close to forgiveness?

I realize that there has been considerable pressure on me to accept this apology and (to use the vernacular) “move on.” After all, I’ve repeatedly been told, it was being offered in good faith. More than that, it was being offered as a full and complete apology, nothing half-baked, and I was assured by several of the apologist’s friends that there was true regret at what had been said—that he might not even have realized that he’d said what he’d said and was particularly distressed by his lack of sensitivity; furthermore, even if he had realized what he’d said, he might have had no idea what those words would mean to someone like me. But what was uttered was nonetheless so hurtful—well, not entirely hurtful, but theoretically painful, and deeply uncomfortable—that a simple apology never seemed to be enough. And there was something else: would I, by acquiescing, be ratifying the worthiness of the apology? It’s so easy to say, “Yes, I accept your apology,” but that could be just a mere step away from saying, “Yes, I accept you.” That’s not going to happen.

Just the other day, someone bumped into me on the subway, a seeming accident, although one can never be sure. A woman actually brought the rubber tip of her crutch down on my left big toe, as if neither I nor my toe existed in her insular world.

“Sorry,” she said.

“Not quite good enough,” I replied. “You’re sorry, but tell that to my toe, the one you might have mangled.”

The look with which she then favored me was brimming with hostility, as if she somehow expected me to trade my physical discomfort for her halfhearted “Sorry.” If she had said, “I’m really, truly sorry that I caused you pain—you must forgive me,” I might have given it consideration, but nothing like that had been voiced. And although I was tempted to respond with equal force, I did not see how I could, especially since she was getting around with some sort of handicap. (Her advanced age did not enter into my calculations, but neither was I able wholly to ignore it.)

But the incident on the subway got me to thinking about the original brouhaha (or, possibly, it was a fracas). I mulled long and hard about the nature of any apology, the degrees of regret, the limits of pardon, and about absolution, the steps of contrition. I’ve concluded that simple remorse is barely worth the trouble of expressing it, and that abjectness may be more calculated than real. I thought about the aches and hurts that we cause one another, however inadvertently, and about how inadequate our rejoinders can be. These musings were prompted by the message that the original offender finally sent—the one accompanied by wine and flowers and Belgian chocolate and a note saying, “I hope that by now you will accept my absolute and heartfelt apology, which I offer without mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that we can finally put this matter behind us.”

Nice try, I said to myself, and you’re getting closer, but the words “this matter” began to gnaw at me, to irritate and, finally, to infuriate me, as if the thing that had been spoken could be reduced to a “matter” rather than a question of respect for the inner core of me and of my beliefs—in the end, a view that touched upon my basic humanity. I realized that I needed to seek an apology for yet another offense, however unintended, or else let those words linger like more slurs, which only become more repellent as they age. I’m sorry that I feel this way, but it’s not something for which I could ever apologize, even were an apology called for."

Jeffrey Frank, The New Yorker
Some slight, satirical humor

Sunday, May 2


excerpt: The Prophet

"What shall I say of these save that they 
too stand in the sunlight, but with their 
backs to the sun? 

They see only their shadows, and their
shadows are their laws.

And what is the sun to them but a caster 
of shadows?

And what is it to acknowledge the laws 
but to stoop down and trace their shadows 
upon the earth?

But you who walk facing the sun, what 
images drawn on the earth can hold you?"

...

"Verily all things move within your being 
in constant half embrace, the desired and
the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished,
the pursued and that which you would escape.

These things move within you as lights
and shadows in pairs that cling.

And when the shadow fades and is no
more, the light that lingers becomes a
shadow to another light.

And thus, your freedom when 
it loses its fetters 
becomes itself 
the fetter of a 
greater freedom."

- Kahlil Gibran

watch, read, listen

before